Welcome to my Reflections Blog. This blog is a collection of events, resources, activities and reflections of my work as an Educator in Auckland, New Zealand. These posts are my own thoughts and opinions and are not a direct reflection of my employers.
Thursday, December 8, 2022
Nga Iwi School 50th Jubliee
Wednesday, October 5, 2022
Assessment for Learning - Professional Development Teacher Only Day
Working with Lizzie Bayliss - Education Group
What is Assessment for Learning:
Latin verb - 'assidere' meaning 'to sit with'. Implies assessment is done with and for students, not done 'to' them. Below is an assignment I wrote giving an explanation for what Assessmet
ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING
Assessment for Learning (AfL) is not an entirely new concept, in fact formative assessment is the precursor to the ideology that is now referred to as AfL (Wiliam, D. 2011). AfL is student driven and involves a collaborative approach to learning, allowing for a more fluid differentiated teaching and learning approach. Assessment for learning has been defined as a process where teachers and students work beside each other to ‘seek, reflect and respond to information gathered through dialogue, demonstration and observation’ to strengthen the learning process (Klenowski. p.264. 2009). AfL tends to learning as it is happening, in teachable moments not only between teacher and student but student to student. It allows teachers and learners to identify misconceptions and adjust and modify learning as it happens, melding learning, teaching and assessment as an ‘integrated entity’. It transforms classroom learning from traditional (teacher directed), to an open learning space that is student centered.
The purpose behind AfL is to develop autonomous, self regulated learners through enhanced student engagement, resulting in increased student achievement. Autonomy in learning develops ‘expertise’ for students to synthesise, adapt and use across the curriculum (Willis. p.2. 2011). AfL promotes a social, collaborative learning platform, where participants (students and teachers) learn ‘beside’ each other, developing communication and metacognitive skills while gaining a collective knowledge as a community of learners. It is reciprocal, student focused and facilitative in construct. Cowie & Bell (1999) termed assessment in an AfL classroom as ‘interactive’, it often doesn’t involve an assessment task, but real time learning situations.
In assessment for learning, students and teachers ‘seek’ aspects of learning requiring further exploration during learning. Teacher and student (or student and peer) ‘reflect’ on the significance of the requisite learning and together share feedback/feedforward regarding next steps. Students then ‘respond’ to the feedback, making adjustments and actioning new learning into the task. The focus is on the learning as opposed to performance (James et.al. 2011) - the process is task oriented and focuses on task proficiency and understanding.
The ‘seek’ element is neither formal, nor necessarily recorded. Information can be gained through discourse, observation or practical endeavour. It is not necessarily restricted to a single student, but can range across a group in how they are working together, whether discussion is on point and understanding of the concept or task is shared across the group. Upon noticing misconceptions, teachers and students set about ‘reflecting’ on what and how they can address it. Teachers rely on their pedagogical content knowledge to facilitate the learning, to guide students through new learning that can be embedded and synthesised as the learning progresses. Noticing and recognising misconceptions requires teachers to use their prior knowledge of students and their knowledge of the context they are teaching in, to ensure clarity in delivery and understanding. Explicit work expectations and feedback are most important in assisting students to set and evaluate goals during learning. The most effective feedback is cognitive, as opposed to outcome based, as it ‘provides students with information that links cues and achievement’ (Butler & Winne. p.251. 1995). It is an ongoing process which promotes motivation and purpose in the learning.
Students ‘respond’ to the information and feedback received, modifying their application, actioning advice and guidance given by the teacher or peer. Klenowski (2009) notes what works best in advice and guidance is not to provide complete solutions, but to give an indication of how to improve - thus encouraging students in mindful problem solving.
The process of AfL requires scaffolding by teachers and is best carried out through modelling ‘seeking, reflecting and responding’ in everyday practice, embedding it into the classroom culture.
Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of educational research, 65(3), 245-281.
Cowie, B., & Bell, B. (1999). A model of formative assessment in science education. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 6(1), 101-116.
James, M., McCormick, R., Black, P., Carmichael, P., Drummond, M. J., Fox, A., ... & Swaffield, S. (2007). Improving learning how to learn: Classrooms, schools and networks. Routledge.
Klenowski, V. (2009). Assessment for learning revisited: An Asia-Pacific perspective.
Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning?. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 3-14. University of London. England
Willis, J. (2010). Assessment for learning as a participative pedagogy.
Assessment Matters 2, 65-84.
Sunday, August 29, 2021
Curriculum Voices Group Hui #2
The Curriculum Voices Group is a diverse group of people from across Aotearoa to draw on a range of voices and perspectives. The role of the group is to provide guidance and feedback on design, development and implementation of the refreshed curriculum. Key words delivered at Hui #2 were - Bicultural/Inclusive, Clear and Easy to Use.
Implementation of the curriculum is taking place over a 5 year period, all eight areas are to be delivered across that time starting with the new Aotearoa Histories Curriculum and Social Sciences. There will be a refreshed vision, and key competencies, Mātauranga Māori, literacy and numeracy will be woven throughout. Curriculum levels will be replaced by phases in a progression framework. Achievement objectives will be replaced by progress statements. There are number of groups involved in the curriculum refresh process. There are the writers, the working group, the review & testers, the focus groups. All of these groups feedback, ideas and suggestions are shared and discussed with the voices group. Sessions during Hui #2 included the direction of the refresh, the draft bicultural and inclusive framework components, draft social sciences feedback, preparing for the change, feedback from the office of the children's commissioner, literacy and Math strategies and comms and engagement.Being part of the Curriculum voices group has given me and our school the opportunity to add clarity to what's ahead. In sharing my learning with staff I likened it to having a seat at the table as opposed to being on the menu. We have an opportunity to be part of this curriculum refresh, being done 'with' instead of done 'to', which is often how educators feel when new key documents are released to schools.
Thursday, August 12, 2021
Trauma informed practice - Teacher Only Day
Teachers often reflect on what the job entails. There has been many conversations across the motu of the different roles teachers have in their day - educator, mum/dad, nurse, psychologist, friend, mediator, seamstress, athlete, artist, judge, jury, writer, policeman...the list is endless.
We know as educators, the ability of a child to learn is determined by a number of things but where it starts for the teacher is in the well being and relationships they develop with each student in front of them. If students don't have these things sorted first, they probably wont meet their true potential.
Today our TOD focused on working with kids who have suffered trauma. We worked with the MoE Learning Support team - Sara, Hannah and May. To be honest I was a little nervous leading into the day as I know the content of trauma can be difficult to navigate. We all have stories to tell of our experiences of working with kids who have suffered trauma and some teachers themselves may have suffered trauma in the past which is not the knowledge of all, I was unsure how this would be managed. I trusted the skills and expertise of the professionals facilitating the session.
The facilitators navigated through a range of content, beginning with culturally sustainable connection to us. Staff were made to feel comfortable, working in an environment created by the facilitators that was both open and safe. By opening themselves up, sharing their culture and heritage through pepeha and experience, we felt safe in being able to share our thoughts and ideas openly with each other. Working in a predominantly Pacifica/Maori community, it was important that the content was culturally appropriate. Our 3 facilitators navigated this exceptionally well, giving guidance and advice that connected to our community and more specifically to the teachers - much of this was done through whakatauki and activities with a cultural twist.
The content delivered specific to trauma is content that I believe every teacher should know and learn about. The neurological impacts, what behaviours manifest through it, the impacts those behaviours have on the child, how we recognise them, what we can do to manage and in some cases negate behaviours. The content was delivered with four objectives in mind - Awareness (Matauranga), Learn (Ako), Support (Tautoko) and Protect (Paruru). We learned about; developmental trauma, culturally responsive practice within trauma informed practice, the adverse childhood experience (ACE) study, Protective and Compensatory Experiences study (PACES), how the brain is affected, fight/flight/freeze, Social and emotional learning through Whare Tapawha and Pacifica perspectives.Our staff finished the day sharing some of their new learning, the things that impacted them most and theirbiggest takeaways. They learned to walk in the sunshine, not in the shadows - focus on the brightness each child brings, not the darkness they encounter. This workshop was engaging, informative and hugely reflective. It gave staff tools for their kite to use and reflect on. What our students go through outside of school is for the most part unknown to us and out of our control. We focus on what is in front of us and how we can grow our tamariki to be the best they can be. This is one PLD that we all walked away from feeling reflective, enlightened and humbled.
Friday, April 30, 2021
Tautai o le Moana - Staff Briefing
Following the Tautai o le Moana fono I attended and reported in my earlier post, I wanted to share my learning with our staff. I was thinking, if anyone asked staff what changes had happened at our school since my participation in the initiative, they would say 'nothing' or 'I don't know'! I felt that the Tauati journey started with me. I spent the year coming to grips with where I sat with my knowledge and understanding of what Pacifica success looked like at our kura and what way finding looked like and felt like for me. So while I spent the year on my own journey, it is now time to bring way finding to our staff. This is the slide deck I created to share in our first Tautai staff PLG and hopefully will give some clarity to staff as to what way finding may look like for us and our community. This is the first of many way finding/Tautai meetings we will have, wish us well on our journey together:-)
TAUTAI O LE MOANA - WELLINGTON HUI 2021
From the 7-9 April 2021, the Tautai o le Moana 2020 cohort attended their last residential hui to meet the new 2021 cohort and to listen to Dr Rae Si'ilata deliver the findings in the Tautai o le Moana Report. Tautai o le Moana is a project driven in partnership between the NZ Pasifika Principals' Association (NZPPA), the New Zealand Principals' Federation (NZPF) and the Ministry of Education (MoE). It is MoE funded and designed and delivered by the NZPPA. Dr Rae Si'ilata was contracted to follow and document the journeys of those participating in the pilot cohort of 2020. The hui itself was hosted by the Tautai o le Moana design team who included Filivaifale Jason Swann, Helen Varney, Sose Annandale, Sepora Mauigoa and Ala'imalo Falefatu Enari who were supported by Fa'atili Iosua Esera, Geoff Siave and of course researcher Dr Rae.
The new 2021 cohort started their induction the day before the 2020s arrived, so a meet and greet took place on the evening of the 7th giving time for both cohorts to meet and get to know each other. After an early breakfast the following day, the group settled in to the days work, starting with a round with all participants sharing one take-away from Tautai so far. This session was reflective of the whakawhanaungatanga and manaakitanga that has be consistent through out all hui and talanoa sessions which have taken place across the initiative so far. There was a lot of emotion, revelation, determination and realisation...all things that participants in the first cohort experienced during their time in the project.
Following this was a presentation from the Principal of Sutton Park Primary School, Fa'atili Iosua Esera. Fa'atili shared his experience and knowledge of culturally sustainable practice through his journey in teaching. His forty years in education gave all those in attendance an inside view in teaching tamariki in a variety of different settings across Aotearoa, tapping into the cultural and environmental attributes and influences brought by them to their learning. He unpacked and emphasised the strength relationships bring to learning not just teacher to student but teacher to whanau and teacher to community. His career success is highlighted through his ability to make connections with those he serves across all divides, always espousing empathy, interest and commitment to student/whanau success.We were privileged to watch the Rangikura School culture group who entertained us with a performancereflecting a multitude of Pasifika and Maori culture. There were close to 30 students in the group who without a doubt mesmerised all those present. This group exemplified passion and commitment to their performance. Eddie Uluilelata, Principal of Rangikura school had a great team tutoring and supporting the group, a mix of teachers, student leaders and whanau. Eddie explained that the students presenting were only a group of the larger team which is 120 strong. It was without a doubt a privilege to watch them and to present them with loli lei at the conclusion of their set. This performance was an example of a strong local curriculum at work. It was exciting to see and hear such high value being placed on the cultural literacies, movement, language, and identity. Students were able to clearly show and articulate their purpose, the learning and the reward for presenting to us. Such a wonderful thing to witness.Following lunch, the group farewelled the 2021 cohort. This concluded with a the 2020 cohort sharing a small taonga, tuakana teina style, where each new member was buddied up with a member of the previous year's cohort. It was rewarding to be able to share what the Tautai experience meant to me and to listen to what it meant to other tautai in my cohort. While we didn't have time to share our whole journey with our teina, we were able to pass on a representation of it through our chosen taonga. My taonga to my teina - Clara Tuifao and Lou Reddy - was a reflection through a whakatauki I found connected to my experience. I challenged them to pay it forward to their teina when the next cohort 2022 begins next year.

















